Thursday, October 4, 2012

Pure Joy: craft area clean up...the beginning

Mom, avert your eyes...oh wait, you've seen this mess in person! Sorry!
So for the month of October I've joined in a little Overhauling of my craft area that Amy from While Wearing Heels and Amie from Pinkapotamus?are hosting!! I'm in desperate need of this overhaul...just ask my husband! Poor guy has to look at this mess EVERY DAY! God bless him for not saying something everyday about the mess because he surely could...probably should (but he's very good to me).

A little back story...when we moved into our new house in April we had the big girls sharing a room and Micah had his own room, and we had a guest/craft room. We were thinking that if this baby was a boy we'd have a girl room, a boy room and a guest/craft room (and a master of course). Then we found out that we're having a girl so we had to get creative. We decided to let the little girls share and give Micah and Naomi their own rooms...which means no more guest/craft room. We do use Naomi's room as a guest room when we need it so feel free to come visit ;). Anyway, since we no longer would have a space for me to store my crafting supplies in a craft room we had to get creative. Greg said we could put the craft stuff in our bedroom...isn't he the best!! I know he'd probably rather I just got rid of 90% of my "supplies" but he puts up with it very graciously!! So, the craft room became a craft corner in our bedroom. Plus more overflow in my closet and still in Naomi's closet.

The craft corner is SO unorganized, so messy and just overflowing...I have a hard time getting rid of things obviously. When I saw this challenge I knew it was PERFECT for me. The rules are simple...no buying craft supplies from October 1-31...share the space, clean and organize the space, make a project with supplies already on hand and share the experience.

So as I thought it through, there's not really anything I need to buy (I just always find excuses to do so), I will be having a baby early in October, thus hopefully keeping me out of the stores as well...so that "no buying" part would be pretty easy! Then I thought if I share my space it may motivate me even more to get things cleaned up because of HOW EMBARRASSING this mess is!! Yikes! Still can't believe I'm sharing these pictures of my space... Next thought, it may take me two weeks or so to get everything cleaned up and organized so if I spill over into November I'm not too worried about it. I've got plenty of items on hand to create projects with and hope to do that throughout the month as well. So, wish me luck! Even with a new baby I'm hoping to get this mess cleaned up! Would love to have a clean space to show our family and friends when they come for baby's baptism at the end of the month!!!

Brace yourself...I am sharing this REAL part of my life with you all. Be kind. Yikes. I'm hoping that by doing this y'all will help hold me accountable to actually get this mess cleaned up! I know Greg would be SOOO happy if/when I do! I'm not going to show the messy closets too....we can all only handle so much CRAP lying around in one day! Can't wait to share some AWESOME after photos by the end of the month!!! And if I decide to actually get rid of some of my "supplies" do you want them?

Shelves with bins from Target!!

Source: http://jamespurejoy.blogspot.com/2012/10/craft-area-clean-upthe-beginning.html

dwts season 14 cast leap day michigan primary results olympia snowe davey jones dead boston weather monsanto

Tuesday, October 2, 2012

Thanks for the transparent memories: Progress in quest for reliable, flexible computer memory for transparent electronics

ScienceDaily (Oct. 2, 2012) ? Very few discoveries happen in an instant. Few discoverers go, "Aha!" More often, the truth reveals itself to scientists the same way a statue comes to light as a sculptor chips away.

This happens even when the work of art is on the nanoscale, where individual things make a strand of hair look like a redwood by comparison.

More than four years ago, a collection of students, postdoctoral researchers and professors at Rice University found themselves chiseling down into a mystery involving two of the most basic, common elements on Earth: carbon and silicon oxide.

The group led by chemist James Tour came to a discovery of note: that it was possible to make bits of computer memory from those elements, but make them much smaller and perhaps better than anything on the market even today.

From that first revelation in 2008 to now, Tour and his team have steadily advanced the science of two-terminal memory devices, which he fully expects will become ubiquitous in the not-too-distant future.

The latest dispatch is a paper in the journal Nature Communications that describes transparent, non-volatile, heat- and radiation-resistant memory chips created in Tour's lab from those same basic elements, silicon and carbon. But a lot has happened since 2008, and these devices bear only a passing resemblance to the original memory unit.

In the new work, Tour and his co-authors detail their success at making memory chips from silicon oxide sandwiched between electrodes of graphene, the single-atom-thick form of carbon.

Even better, they were able to put those test chips onto flexible pieces of plastic, leading to paper-thin, see-through memories they hope can be manufactured with extraordinarily large capacities at a reasonable price. Think about what that can do for heads-up windshields or displays with embedded electronics, or even flexible, transparent cellphones.

"The interest is starting to climb," said Tour, Rice's Rice's T.T. and W.F. Chao Chair in Chemistry as well as a professor of mechanical engineering and materials science and of computer science. "We're working with several companies that are interested either in getting their chips to do this kind of switching or in the possibility of making radiation-hard devices out of this."

In fact, samples of the chips have climbed all the way to the International Space Station (ISS), where memories created and programmed at Rice are being evaluated for their ability to withstand radiation in a harsh environment.

"Now, we've seen a couple of DARPA announcements asking for proposals for devices based on silicon oxide, the very thing we've shown. So there are other people seeing the feasibility of this approach," Tour said.

It wasn't always so, even if silicon oxide "is the most studied material in humankind," he said.

"Labs in the '60s and '70s that saw the switching effect didn't have the tools to understand what they were looking at," he said. "They didn't know how to exploit it; they called it a soft breakdown in silicon. To them, it was something bad."

In the original work at Rice, researchers put strips of graphite, the bulk form of carbon best known as pencil lead, across a silicon oxide substrate and noticed that applying strong voltage would break the carbon; lower voltages would repeatedly heal and re-break the circuit. They recognized a break could be a "0? and a healed circuit a "1." That's a switch, the most basic memory state.

Manufacturers who have been able to fit millions of such switches on small devices in the likes of flash memory now find themselves bumping against the physical limits of their current architectures, which require three wires -- or terminals -- to control and read each bit.

But the Rice unit, requiring only two terminals, made it far less complicated. It meant arrays of two-terminal memory could be stacked in three-dimensional configurations that would vastly increase the amount of information a chip could hold.

And best of all, the mechanism that made it possible turned out not to be in the graphite, but the silicon oxide. In the breakthrough 2010 paper that followed the 2008 discovery, the researchers led by then-graduate student Jun Yao found that a strong jolt of voltage through a piece of silicon oxide stripped oxygen atoms from a channel only 5 nanometers wide, turning it into pure silicon. Lower voltages would break the channel or reconnect it, repeatedly, thousands of times.

"Jun was the first to recognize what he was seeing," Tour said. "Nobody believed him, though (Rice physicist) Doug Natelson said, 'You know, it's not out of the realm of possibility.' The people on the graphitic memory project were not at all excited about him saying this and they argued with Jun tooth and nail for a couple of years."

Yao struggled to convince his lab partners the switching effect wasn't due to the breaking graphite but to the underlying crystalline silicon. "Jun quietly continued his work and stacked up evidence, eventually building a working device with no graphite," Tour said. Still, he recalled, Yao's colleagues suspected that carbon in the system skewed the results. So he demonstrated another device with no possible exposure to carbon at all.

Yao's revelation became the basis for the next-generation memories now being designed in Tour's lab, where silicon oxides sandwiched between graphene layers are being attached to plastic sheets. There's not a speck of metal in the entire unit (with the exception of leads attached to the graphene electrodes). And the eye can see right through it.

"Now we're making these memories with about an 80 percent yield of working devices, which is pretty good for a non-industrial lab," Tour said. "When you get these ideas into industries' hands, they really sharpen it up."

The idea of transparency came later. "Silicon oxide is basically the same material as glass, so it should be transparent," Tour said. Graphene sheets, single-atom-thick carbon honeycombs, are almost completely transparent, too, and tests detailed in the new paper showed their ability to function as crossbar electrodes, a checkerboard array half above and half below the silicon oxide that creates a circuit where the lines intersect.

The marriage of silicon and graphene would extend the long-recognized utility of the first and prove once and for all the value of the second, long touted as a wonder material looking for a reason to be.

"It was a very rewarding experience," said Yao, now a postdoctoral researcher at Harvard, of his work at Rice. "I feel grateful that I stumbled on this, had the support of my advisers and persisted."

By good fortune, Yao was the rare graduate student with three advisers. As confusing as that may have seemed at the start of his Rice career, it was luck those advisers were digital systems expert Lin Zhong and condensed matter physicist Natelson, both rising stars in their fields, and Tour, a renowned chemist.

Each made important contributions to the project as it progressed. "Doug had very acute intuition about the underlying mechanism, and we constantly turned to Lin for his advice on the electronic architecture," Yao said.

Getting his story on Page 1 of the New York Times was enough of a thrill, but another was ahead as NASA decided to include samples of his chip in an experimental package bound for the space station. The day of Yao's planned departure for his postdoctoral job in Cambridge, Aug. 24, 2011, was to be the best of all as the HIMassSEE project lifted off from Central Asia aboard a cargo flight to the ISS. Minutes later, the unmanned craft crashed in Siberia.

Nearly a year later, a new set of chips made it to the ISS, where they will stay for two years to test their ability to hold a pattern when exposed to radiation in space.

In the meantime, Yao passed responsibility for the project to Jian Lin, a co-author of the new paper who joined the Tour and Natelson labs in 2011 as a postdoctoral researcher. Lin built the latest iterations of silicon oxide memories using crossbar graphene electrodes.

"Our lab members are excellent at synthesizing materials and I'm good at fabrication of devices for various applications, so we work together well," said Lin, whose primary interest is in the application of nanomaterials. "This group is a win-win for me."

Labs at other institutions have picked up the thread, carrying out their own experiments on silicon oxide memory. "The switching mechanism has pretty much been investigated," Lin said. "But from engineering or application perspectives, there are a lot of things that can be done."

So here silicon memory stands, a toddler full of promise. Researchers at Rice and elsewhere are working to increase silicon memory's capacity and improve its reliability while electronics manufacturers think hard about how to make it in bulk and put it into products.

Tour realizes impatience for scientific progress is a function of hurried times and not a failure of the process, but he counsels against frustration. "It's a very interesting system that has been slow to develop," he said, "as we've been working to understand the fundamental switching mechanism," a task largely accomplished by Yao and his Rice advisers in a paper published earlier this year. "This is now transitioning slowly into an applied system that could well be taken up as a future memory system.

"It is a good example of basic research," he said. "Now, others have to be able to look forward from the science and say, 'You know, there's a path to a product here.'"

Co-authors of the Nature Communications paper are Rice graduate students Yanhua Dai, Gedeng Ruan, Zheng Yan and Lei Li. Zhong is an associate professor of electrical and computer engineering. Natelson is a professor of physics and astronomy and of electrical and computer engineering.

The research was supported by the David and Lucille Packard Foundation, the Texas Instruments Leadership University Fund, the National Science Foundation and the Army Research Office.

Share this story on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:


Story Source:

The above story is reprinted from materials provided by Rice University. The original article was written by Mike Williams.

Note: Materials may be edited for content and length. For further information, please contact the source cited above.


Journal Reference:

  1. Jun Yao, Jian Lin, Yanhua Dai, Gedeng Ruan, Zheng Yan, Lei Li, Lin Zhong, Douglas Natelson, James M. Tour. Highly transparent nonvolatile resistive memory devices from silicon oxide and graphene. Nature Communications, 2012; 3: 1101 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms2110

Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.

Disclaimer: Views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect those of ScienceDaily or its staff.

Source: http://feeds.sciencedaily.com/~r/sciencedaily/top_news/top_science/~3/Saz4QMEbv_Y/121002145756.htm

words with friends words with friends phlebotomy dog show best in show bret michaels bret michaels

Court trims verdict over 'Nash Bridges' profits

LOS ANGELES (AP) ? A divided appellate court upheld Don Johnson's multimillion jury award over profits from the series "Nash Bridges" but cut its amount by more than $8 million on Monday.

The California 2nd District Court of Appeal panel voted 2-1 to uphold a verdict that determined the actor was owed millions from the hit series, but cut its amount from $23.2 million down to $15 million. The actor is still eligible to recoup interest on the award, which was originally calculated at more than $28 million.

The justices determined that jurors erred when they took into account that Johnson might have earned interest payments while fighting the case, which ended in 2010 with the multimillion verdict. The panel decided to add 5 percent interest to the original $15 million amount they agreed Johnson should receive, according to the opinion released Monday.

Johnson's award was appealed by the series' producers and financiers, Rysher Entertainment, 2929 Entertainment and Qualia Capital.

One justice agreed with the companies that Johnson's verdict should be overturned because his claims were barred by the statute of limitations, but two justices sided with the actor.

"Nash Bridges" aired for six seasons on CBS.

Attorneys handling the case were not immediately available for comment. The companies could appeal Monday's ruling to the California Supreme Court.

They argued at trial that the series was costly to produce and that was why Johnson hadn't been paid more.

Johnson was awarded half of the show's copyrights at trial, which made him eligible to receive continued profits from the show as long as it remains in syndication.

___

Anthony McCartney can be reached at http://twitter.com/mccartneyAP

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/court-trims-verdict-over-nash-bridges-profits-191453534.html

ncaa basketball tournament 2012 megamillions winning numbers lotto winner michael oher jerry lee lewis cesar chavez winning lotto numbers

Plants' Carbon-Sinking Capacity Is Much Lower Than Thought

A new long-term field study shows that plants grow less under elevated carbon conditions owing to limitations in soil nutrients--bad news as atmospheric CO2 increases


Forest & Sun Plants need enriched soil to make use of increasing carbon dioxide. Image: Flickr/emrox

  • Showcasing more than fifty of the most provocative, original, and significant online essays from 2011, The Best Science Writing Online 2012 will change the way...

    Read More??

By Amanda Mascarelli of Nature magazine

As carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere continue to climb, most climate models project that the world?s oceans and trees will keep soaking up more than half of the extra CO2. But researchers report this week that the capacity for land plants to absorb more CO2 will be much lower than previously thought, owing to limitations in soil nutrients.

Because plants take up CO2 during photosynthesis, it has long been assumed that they will provide a large carbon ?sink? to help offset increases in atmospheric CO2 caused by the burning of fossil fuels. Some scientists have argued that the increase might even be good for plants, which would presumably grow faster and mop up even more CO2. Climate models estimate that the world?s oceans have absorbed about 30% of the CO2 that humans have released in the past 150 years and that land plants have gulped another 30%. But the latest study, by ecologists Peter Reich and Sarah Hobbie at the University of Minnesota in St Paul, suggests that estimates of how much CO2 land plants can use are far too optimistic. Plants also need soil nutrients, such as nitrogen and phosphorus, to grow. But few studies have tested whether soils contain enough of these nutrients to fuel growth in proportion to rising CO2.

?This work addresses a question that?s been out there for decades,? says Bruce Hungate, an ecosystem scientist at Northern Arizona University in Flagstaff. "It's a hard question to answer, because it takes a long time to see how ecosystem carbon and nitrogen cycles change."

Long-term growth
In a 13-year field experiment on 296 open-air plots, the researchers grew perennial grassland species under ambient and elevated concentrations of both atmospheric CO2 and soil nitrogen.

?Rather than building a time machine and comparing how ecosystems behave in 2070 ? which is hard to do ? we basically create the atmosphere of 2070 above our plots,? says Reich.

Reich and Hobbie found that from 2001 to 2010, grasses growing under heightened CO2 levels grew only half as much in untreated as in enriched nitrogen soils.

Researchers do not have a firm grasp on the complexities of nitrogen and carbon cycle interactions, so ?the vast majority of models do not adequately reflect nutrient limitation?, says Adrien Finzi, a biogeochemist at Boston University in Massachusetts. ?The real strength in this study is that now we have this 13-year record of a single ecosystem. It provides a really strong case for the claim that soil resources and nitrogen limitation in particular can impose a major constraint on carbon storage in terrestrial ecosystems.?

A study published in March modeled nutrient cycling across the globe to predict how much carbon plants could sequester over the next 100 years when nutrient limitations are taken into account. Those simulations, which included nitrogen limitations in northern hemisphere soils and phosphorus limitations in the tropics, predicted that land plants will absorb 23% less carbon than is projected by other models.

Researchers say that much more work is needed to understand how nutrient dynamics will affect carbon uptake ? particularly in forest ecosystems, which are expected to be important carbon sinks. Often, says Hungate, these ecosystems seem to offer a ?partial, natural, easy solution? to the climate problem. ?But it turns out that in reality, ecosystems are complex and only have limited flexibility.?

This article is reproduced with permission from the magazine Nature. The article was first published on October 1, 2012.

Source: http://rss.sciam.com/click.phdo?i=f28ec5c0849da1acfe5f6402c6729bdd

ivan rodriguez planetary resources mothers day gift ideas natalee holloway scotty mccreery megan fox pregnant metta world peace suspension

Monday, October 1, 2012

Codgigo Cube Review

I love to play games. And I love technology. So when I saw the Codigo Cube, I just had to try it. ?What is this cube? Why are there QR codes on all sides? ?What happens if I scan one of those QR codes? How can this be a game? ?Would it be fun?? So [...]

Source: http://the-gadgeteer.com/2012/09/30/codgigo-cube-review/

lea michele michael buble michael buble teddy roosevelt rita hayworth rita hayworth lakers rumors

GOP hopes of a Senate takeover fade

The presidential race isn?t the only unpredictable war for control of Washington this year. Keep an eye on the U.S. Senate.

Expectations of a Republican takeover, which were widespread over the summer, are fading. Now the Democrats could retain their majority. Either way, it?s close, and no one can safely say which party will have a Senate majority after the Nov. 6 elections.

Among the changes in the landscape: President Barack Obama has an edge over Republican Mitt Romney in national polls as well as in key swing states such as Virginia and Nevada, suggesting that Democrats might turn out in bigger numbers and also vote for Democratic Senate candidates.

Another: The once-vulnerable seat held by Sen. Claire McCaskill of Missouri now appears safely Democratic since the Republican nominee, U.S. Rep. Todd Akin, said this summer that women rarely got pregnant in cases of ?legitimate rape.?

Republicans need a net gain of four seats to take control of the Senate if Obama wins, three if Romney is elected ? since his vice president would break a tie. Democrats now control 53 seats, but 23 of them are at stake. Republicans need to defend only 10.

Adding to the uncertainty: 2012 isn?t shaping up as a ?wave election,? when voters routinely sweep candidates of one political party out of office.

Instead, ?there?s hand-to-hand combat, state by state,? said Nathan Gonzales, a political analyst at the nonpartisan Rothenberg Political Report.

He and other experts advise watching 10 races. Five are genuine tossups, too close to call and likely to hinge on the right last-minute ads or debate quirks, or whether partisans do turn out in big numbers for Romney or Obama.

Rothenberg and The Cook Political Report, a nonpartisan firm that follows campaigns closely, agree that at the moment, Montana, North Dakota and Virginia, now held by Democrats, and Massachusetts and Nevada, now Republican seats, are too close to call.

A second group of contests have potential to become volatile: Hawaii, Wisconsin and Missouri, all now Democratic seats, and Indiana, now held by a Republican. Also in the mix is the Connecticut seat held by retiring Sen. Joe Lieberman, an independent who caucuses with Democrats.

The dominant issue in all these races is the economy and who can best fix it. One factor that doesn?t appear to be driving Senate campaigns is the public?s disdain for Congress. Gallup found earlier this month that Congress? approval rating had sunk to 13 percent, its lowest figure this late in an election year since such polls began in 1974.

With Democrats now in charge of the White House and Senate, and Republicans holding a majority in the House of Representatives, voters tend to see Washington inertia as the result of gridlock, not ineptitude. Voters figure that if only they can elect more people from the party they prefer, Washington will work.

?Everyone thinks their party can do better,? said David Damore, an associate professor of political science at the University of Nevada Las Vegas.

Here are the races to watch closely:

Montana

Two candidates who?ve successfully run statewide, freshman incumbent Democratic Sen. Jon Tester, and Republican Denny Rehberg, the state?s six-term at-large congressman, are in a slugfest that?s impossible to call. The Cook Political Report?s Jennifer Duffy termed this race ?a marathon on a treadmill.?

Source: http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/09/30/3027057/gop-hopes-of-a-senate-takeover.html

Mens Gymnastics Allison Schmitt Olympic Schedule Kyla Ross Ryan Lochte Montenegro Olympic Games

Explaining What The Foundations Of Any Home Business Should Be

It's an industry which grows by the year as more and more people realize how to generate an income from the comfort of their favorite arm chair at home via the power of the internet. Starting your own home business is a big move, however, and despite wanting to make money online a lot of people fail. This tip-filled article will help you nail down the nuts and bolts of any successful work from home opportunity.

When it comes to advertising you do not need a lot of money to spend. The beauty of the internet allows you to make the most of free resources or very low cost advertising methods which enable you to increase website traffic and generate potential customers for your business. Just be careful to ensure that your ads are specific. There is a difference between getting a lot of visitors and getting relevant visitors.

There is nothing stopping regular people like you from earning a living on the internet.


Full time dad Russ Howe explains how he was able to make money online despite starting with nothing.

When it comes to filing expenses there is one very handy thing you should do to ensure you never get mixed up with your finances and that's keeping your home checking account separate from your business checking account. This will make tax returns far simpler for you.

Most of us like the idea of getting out of bed and earning money from the living room while watching tv. But you will also miss the outside interaction you get from a day-to-day job after a while. Working for yourself is about spare time, not all the time, so always remember to schedule meetings with friends or family to avoid feeling by yourself all the time.

People often underestimate the amount of work involved in becoming your own boss. The pictures of Guru's sat on beaches earning money for seemingly no effort paint a false picture of what it's like. Before embarking on any venture be sure you have sufficient time to put into it, otherwise you will not really get anywhere.

A well-developed business plan is essential to your business success. Even if you do not think you need one, you do. You should consider drafting your own business plan right now. Business plans are useful because they allow you to organize your goals, strategy, and deadlines as well as get into a business mindset.

For those looking to provide a service it would be wise to create a contract for future customers. This allows you to have everything in place before you actually start, making things far easier when you get moving.

Now that you have a greater idea of what you need to do to create and manage a home business, you should start feeling like you can make money online after all. Remember that the information you learned here, however, is only going to work if you apply it. If you follow the tips in this article, then your home business should succeed very nicely indeed.

Source: http://freigeld.blogspot.com/2012/09/explaining-what-foundations-of-any-home.html

dale earnhardt jr michigan primary school shooting daytona 500 winner cleveland plain dealer barry sanders barry sanders